GraphQL vs REST
GraphQL and REST can both be used to build production APIs, but they model API interaction differently.
In REST, the API is usually organized around resources and HTTP endpoints. In GraphQL, the API is organized around a typed schema and operations.
A REST API might expose:
GET /users/42
GET /users/42/posts
POST /users
PATCH /users/42
DELETE /users/42
A GraphQL API may expose a single endpoint such as /graphql, with operations represented in the schema:
query {
user(id: "42") {
name
posts {
title
}
}
}
GraphQL's single endpoint does not mean that GraphQL has only one operation. The schema can expose many query fields and mutation fields through that endpoint.
REST strengths
REST integrates naturally with HTTP semantics. HTTP caching, status codes, proxies, CDNs, and resource-oriented tooling are well understood.
GraphQL strengths
GraphQL provides a strongly typed schema, client-controlled selection sets, nested data fetching, introspection, and a unified API contract.
Important distinction
GraphQL does not eliminate HTTP. GraphQL is frequently transported over HTTP. It changes how API operations and response shapes are modeled rather than replacing the network itself.
REST: resources/endpoints; GraphQL: schema/operationsREST: server-defined representation; GraphQL: client selectionREST commonly uses HTTP; GraphQL commonly uses HTTPThe most important difference is the API model. GraphQL exposes a typed graph of operations and fields rather than simply moving REST resources behind a single URL.
- REST is resource-oriented while GraphQL is schema and operation-oriented.
- GraphQL commonly uses one HTTP endpoint but can expose many operations.
- GraphQL still commonly runs over HTTP.
- Both approaches can be appropriate for production systems.
Which statement most accurately describes GraphQL compared with REST?