Multi-Tenant Isolation Patterns
Options include shared collections with tenant IDs, separate schemas, database-per-tenant, and hybrid isolation.
How to apply it
Scope reads, updates, deletes, aggregations, exports, search, and background jobs by verified tenant context. Add constraints and explicit cross-tenant denial tests. Choose isolation based on compliance, scale, customization, and cost.
Worked example
Query a project using both its ID and the authenticated organization ID rather than ID alone.
Common mistakes to avoid
A missed tenant filter in an export or worker can expose customer data.
Practice task
Implement this concept in the capstone. Add one positive test, one negative or failure-path test, and a short note explaining the trade-off you chose.
Every tenant-owned read, write, delete, aggregation, export, search result, and background job must enforce tenant scope.
- Options include shared collections with tenant IDs, separate schemas, database-per-tenant, and hybrid isolation.
- Scope reads, updates, deletes, aggregations, exports, search, and background jobs by verified tenant context.
What is the strongest production practice for Multi-Tenant Isolation Patterns?